<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Don’t People Smile in Old Photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stumblerz.com/why-don%e2%80%99t-people-smile-in-old-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stumblerz.com/why-don%e2%80%99t-people-smile-in-old-photos/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 02:36:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.stumblerz.com/why-don%e2%80%99t-people-smile-in-old-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-5064</link>
		<dc:creator>lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 09:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stumblerz.com/?p=310#comment-5064</guid>
		<description>also showing teeth in black n white picture won&#039;t look opt. but indeed it a very elite profession those time. now even couple of year old kid also takes a snap using iphone :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also showing teeth in black n white picture won&#8217;t look opt. but indeed it a very elite profession those time. now even couple of year old kid also takes a snap using iphone :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilly</title>
		<link>http://www.stumblerz.com/why-don%e2%80%99t-people-smile-in-old-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-4927</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 01:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stumblerz.com/?p=310#comment-4927</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-4663&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@J&lt;/a&gt; 
Calm down. it&#039;s not that serious. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-4663" rel="nofollow">@J</a><br />
Calm down. it&#8217;s not that serious. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.stumblerz.com/why-don%e2%80%99t-people-smile-in-old-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-4663</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stumblerz.com/?p=310#comment-4663</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t even spell &#039;meet&#039; and you&#039;re professing to be an expert and &#039;relate&#039; to the subject? It has nothing to do with people not being happy and having a hard life. Most of the people who had their picture taken in the 19th century were wealthy enough to afford to do so, thus they had a fine life comparatively. 

The fact is the exposure of the film took more than a minute (and as someone said, you had to be still to ensure it didn&#039;t blur the image). Besides which, why would anyone sit/stand there and smile for a minute or two? That would be absurd and it wouldn&#039;t occur to them. You don&#039;t smile for a photo, you smile when you are showing emotion. It was more important to show a realistic (and not blurred) image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t even spell &#8216;meet&#8217; and you&#8217;re professing to be an expert and &#8216;relate&#8217; to the subject? It has nothing to do with people not being happy and having a hard life. Most of the people who had their picture taken in the 19th century were wealthy enough to afford to do so, thus they had a fine life comparatively. </p>
<p>The fact is the exposure of the film took more than a minute (and as someone said, you had to be still to ensure it didn&#8217;t blur the image). Besides which, why would anyone sit/stand there and smile for a minute or two? That would be absurd and it wouldn&#8217;t occur to them. You don&#8217;t smile for a photo, you smile when you are showing emotion. It was more important to show a realistic (and not blurred) image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haurowitz/Harris’ Goods and Sundries &#171; Jewish Book Council Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stumblerz.com/why-don%e2%80%99t-people-smile-in-old-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-4389</link>
		<dc:creator>Haurowitz/Harris’ Goods and Sundries &#171; Jewish Book Council Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stumblerz.com/?p=310#comment-4389</guid>
		<description>[...] My aunt, Jackie Cohen, put together a history of my relatives. In the only picture of my great grandfather Joe, he is standing proudly in his grocery store, apron wrapped around his prodigious middle, goods stacked to the rafters all around him. Like most people of his generation, he doesn’t smile (when did smiling in pictures start?). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My aunt, Jackie Cohen, put together a history of my relatives. In the only picture of my great grandfather Joe, he is standing proudly in his grocery store, apron wrapped around his prodigious middle, goods stacked to the rafters all around him. Like most people of his generation, he doesn’t smile (when did smiling in pictures start?). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.stumblerz.com/why-don%e2%80%99t-people-smile-in-old-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-4191</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stumblerz.com/?p=310#comment-4191</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2402&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Shanon &lt;/a&gt; 

Bingo.  It just wasn&#039;t the cultural norm to smile for the camera.  While it&#039;s true that in the early days of photography long exposure times required people to pose for minutes at a time, technological advances eliminated the need for these long exposures by the 20th century.  Clearly it was just not the accepted norm to smile for the camera; people tried to look natural.  The movement toward smiling developed as personal camera ownership became more and more widespread and &quot;Mom&quot; wanted &quot;Junior&quot; to smile and look happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2402" rel="nofollow">@Shanon </a> </p>
<p>Bingo.  It just wasn&#8217;t the cultural norm to smile for the camera.  While it&#8217;s true that in the early days of photography long exposure times required people to pose for minutes at a time, technological advances eliminated the need for these long exposures by the 20th century.  Clearly it was just not the accepted norm to smile for the camera; people tried to look natural.  The movement toward smiling developed as personal camera ownership became more and more widespread and &#8220;Mom&#8221; wanted &#8220;Junior&#8221; to smile and look happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.406 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-11 18:40:12 -->

