now that said reasons why.

1.the original novel was meant to be dark not this “watered down” if its meant to be dark leave it there.

2.The movie had next to no rhythm, it was either fast paced , or slower than turtle you get the idea.
it felt disconnected almost random at times.
flopping back to the past , then back to the future.

3. some of the characters where great like Rorschach (Jackie Earl Haley)
brilliant . but others flopped like the limp noodle that i saw way too much of on mister manhattan.

the poor tortured girl and her horrible life .

please ive seen better drama in my local neighborhood.

4.the movie had good violence and gore unedited is good but,
some of the scenes were drawn out too long .

5. To have done the comic justice and to have the detail they needed it should have been a 2 parter or 3 or no dice.

before seeing this i had no previous knowledge to the comic.

after going back to the comic i see typical Hollywood (cut and paste)

leaving stuff out that would have made the movie great.

A story is only as good as the person who tells it.

On this note the director epically “failed” in rhythm and in portrayal.

it would have been brilliant but ended up a steaming pile.

Thank you for feedback, but James there was no need to use such a foul language. That guy just left his review.

I wrote watchman with intention and I did not use “e” for other reasons which I am not willing to share.

But please watch your language and grow up.

ps- I used it tags for typos so people can find it. Dude seriously, guys like you make me laugh, because you take internet so seriously..